Weekly roundup

Here’s what you missed last week!

🏛️ Policy & Payers

  • Regional volatility is shaking up insurance exchanges, evidenced by Arkansas facing a 69% surge in ACA premiums for 2026.

  • Prior authorization burden is getting a little lighter as Optum Rx eliminates reauthorizations for 40 additional drugs effective Jan. 1.

  • Insurers are bracing for instability as the expiration of ACA subsidies creates uncertainty for future premiums and coverage.

📈 Business & Tech

  • Non-profit insurers are increasingly labeling their mergers as affiliations to maintain local operations while combining assets.

  • Provider organizations are aggressively hiring payer contracting talent to strengthen their negotiation leverage against insurance plans.

  • Healthcare leaders are deploying AI-enabled ERP systems to boost back-office efficiency and ensure regulatory compliance.

⭐ Just for Fun

The Deep Dive

The most dangerous KPI in dermatology? New patient volume

New patient volume often becomes the headline metric that defines a "good month." When that number climbs, it’s easy to assume the practice is growing. But volume and margin are not the same thing.

For a mature practice, high new patient counts can mask operational strain. A surge of low-acuity, low-conversion new patient visits may fill the schedule, but it slows the day, pushes timing off, and lowers the value of each clinical hour. When the mix tips too far, the day gets harder without any real improvement in financial performance.

The operational ripple effect

Established patient (EP) visits run on rhythm. Providers and MAs already know the flow and the history, so the visit moves smoothly. New patient visits, by contrast, introduce volatility that disrupts this cadence from the moment they walk in the door.

It starts at intake. New patient registration is materially heavier than an EP check-in. Verification takes longer and patients often arrive with questions that delay the handoff to clinical staff. This tightens the rooming cadence before the patient is even seen.

Once inside, the scope often creeps. A "simple rash" expands into a complex workup; a spot check turns into a full-body exam with biopsy discussions. Even when templated correctly, the variability is significant. A single wrong-slot new patient visit at 9:15 doesn't just slow that specific encounter, it pushes charting into the next hour and forces the rest of the morning session to absorb the delay.

The financial reality

New patient visits carry higher acquisition and setup costs. Marketing spend, call center time, extended intake, and longer visit duration all occur before any claim is submitted. Past a certain new patient share, each added new patient slot becomes less a growth lever and more a trade-off that lowers revenue per hour.

This is often compounded by the “one-and-done” visit: a patient who comes once for a benign concern and doesn’t return. The practice absorbs the front-loaded work without capturing long-term value from chronic care or procedural needs.

There is also meaningful opportunity cost. A low-acuity new patient slot, often billed as a 99203, may displace a more efficient sequence such as a 99213 paired with 17000 (LN2 destruction) or a straightforward 11102 biopsy. The difference in margin and throughput across these combinations becomes pronounced when the schedule tilts heavily toward diagnostic new patient visits.

You’ll typically see biopsy density (11102 utilization) drop on new patient heavy days. When providers operate under time pressure, encounters narrow, reducing the likelihood of identifying clinically appropriate biopsies during the visit.

Template integrity

Several patterns consistently create strain:

  • Cosmetic drift: Cosmetic consults placed in standard medical new patient slots.

  • Surgical rule-outs: Potential excisions booked into short diagnostic blocks.

  • Clustering: High-variability visits clustered back-to-back without buffer.

When these mismatches stack up, the schedule becomes reactive. Room turnover slows, documentation accumulates, and MA workflow becomes harder to balance.

Template engineering

Addressing this requires intentional schedule structure.

1. Set defined new patient limits: Many mature providers function more effectively when new patient volume stays within a set portion of the session. This protects procedural time and preserves pace.

2. Protect key hours: Mid-morning through early afternoon should remain available for established care and procedures. Placing new patients at the start or end of the day gives the schedule room to absorb timing variability.

3. Differentiate new patient visit types: A full-body new patient exam and a focused new patient visit have different operational footprints. Booking systems and front desk workflows should reflect that distinction.

A quick diagnostic

As you prep for 2026, review the last 20 sessions for your busiest provider. On days with higher new patient volume, look for:

  • Delays after lunch.

  • Slower rooming or MA workflow interruptions.

  • An uptick in mismatched new patient bookings.

  • Lower revenue generated per clinical hour.

If these patterns appear consistently, new patient mix is influencing both flow and margin.

Bottom line: Sustainable growth comes from getting the mix right and keeping the schedule structured in a way that supports both the clinical side and the numbers.

Need a pro?

When you're ready for an expert to make your practice's billing bulletproof, schedule a strategy call with our team.

That’s it for this week.

This one was super fun. Hope you enjoyed it too.

What did you think of today's edition?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Reply

or to participate

Keep Reading

No posts found